Are our
memories
gone?


a§s is a tool for aesthetic, philosophical, political and poetic experimentation. Every second Wednesday of the month, a§s invites guest contributors, artists and researchers to honour a desire that they will be able to develop in a project that will be made public. Self-initiated, this project of multiple collaborations is a space for meeting, inventing and sharing.

First of all, there's a little teenage fascination. Beyond their provocative aspect, which sometimes borders on the grotesque, the videos of Camp Kill Yourself and Jackass highlight a certain relationship with the body, through exacerbations of the fall. The successive scenes follow a carefully thought-out protocol in which risk-taking acts as a source of experimentation rather than insolence, taking the form of catharsis.
       Camp Kill Yourself is a series of videos that began in the late 1990s, combining skateboarding, antics and stunts, each more extreme than the last. Created by Bam Margera and director Brandon DiCamillo, the series is the big name behind the hugely popular Jackass series, which was adopted by MTV in the early 2000s. The team, made up mainly of skateboarders, produced videos combining skateboarding, music and light-hearted jokes. Produced with limited, often pirated, resources, the videos made repeated use of bodily provocations that first interspersed with images of skateboarding; figures often shown in two versions: one a failure, the other a success, glory or a sometimes violent fall, bodies sliding through space. Influenced by the chaotic and extreme performances of certain punk artists (most notably GG Allin, to whom an alcoholic and urinary tribute is paid), the phenomenon is one of generalised unconsciousness and awakens in the viewer the limits of what he or she can admit—like Michael Hanneke's Funny Game, which I appreciate just as much.
       This vignette highlights the singular joys that enable and enhance uninhibited, nothing-conceptual, cheeky-resolutely sexy attitudes. From the desire to create one's own living tools for experimentation, surveying and error, a§s feeds on the legacies that inspire these attitudes, and becomes a project in its own right—albeit a rather conformist one by comparison. These practices emphasise the process as a tool rather than their ends, in a dynamic that genuinely welcomes trial-and its doubts. a§s is a project that adapts to the proposals of its guests. Like Public Access Poetry or Mel Chin & The Gala Committee (In the name of the Place) in completely different registers, these practices above all question the spaces that make it possible to accommodate these experimental postures. They awaken the idea that having such a space, whether to work or to express oneself, is also a matter of privilege-that which allows the freedom to do: if freedom is meant to be infinite, but power is limited, it is an immense asset to have access to the means that allow us to go beyond what limits it. The question of space, first of all, brings with it all the material means that frame, encourage or constrain the production of its effects.
       This essential freedom, our desire to express a point of view in its tenuous correlation with the world and to embrace all the ambiguities that run through us, requires that there be places and people to welcome them, who take on an imperative of care, a responsibility to listen. These relationships of contact, which are lived through the eyes, in a sensitive relationship with the experience of the other, allow the mutually desired encounter to radiate. Here, I think spontaneously of Lygia Clark's Relational Objects, but also of Laurence Rassel: on the one hand, of manifesting memories-immediately, and appointments; on the other, of the importance of hospitality.

a§s is a project whose main tools are hospitality, invitation and welcome. Hospitality is traditionally defined as the ability to welcome others in a friendly and benevolent manner. Welcoming already presupposes a radical form of openness and decentring, of being outside oneself, potentially containing the whole ethical and political question of the relationship to oneself and to others, to the place we devote to them. Space is its support; the place, the surface, is responsible for relaying its dynamics more clearly. Let's imagine hospitality as a space that receives. Creating this space of intimacy, of sharing, the threshold —its smile— does not act as a space protected from the world. In spite of the walls, it is not outside the world, as the White Cube tries to pretend in a totally dystopian way. It is a place traversed by the experience of the real which, without a pause, would each time allow the encounter of an otherness, welcomed as such. Making space is a transitory response to wandering, an uncertain halt that lasts only as long as the hospitality. Chosen, entrusted, elected, a moment is made.
       From these reflections on hospitality, I draw inspiration from the attitude of the hostesses, as a concept or metaphor, from the know-how in charge of the work of hospitality, from their smiles. They evoke the work of the shadows so that everything can run smoothly on stage. This attitude is akin to an economy of giving, which this role epitomises: assigned to the female gender because of its propensity to listen, being available and provide care, this figure illustrates the multiple expertise of those who welcome; although by definition, they do not own the place they occupy. Hospitality is all about exposure to others, insofar as they affect us. Meetings, from which genuine moments of sharing can emerge, are just as likely to renew this outward dynamic. By inviting these people, by encouraging the joy of doing things and honouring their desires, our freedoms radiate outwards. The responsibility of those who welcome is to allow this expression to be free, to nurture trust.

Finally, exhibiting: honouring the guests' intuitions, making a proposal concrete and tangible, and putting a deadline to it. The collaborations are intended to be total, adaptive, spontaneous and available to those invited. Ex-posing, too, posing on the outside. Fading into the background, as an otherwise powerful action; allowing a transgression of interiority and exteriority. Exhibiting as a gesture of memory, of encounter, of contact. Intriguing, unknown, without seeking to assimilate or reduce to the known: an exhibition gives place, without asking for reciprocity or a pact. Hospitality also means allowing oneself to be altered by the other, letting them call my home and my identity into question.
       In addition to exhibitions, there are the usual ‘vernissages’ (vernissages in French means ‘opening’ whose etymology implies "putting on varnish"), the name of which already betrays the custom. To exhibit goes far beyond all mundanities: it is already a powerful act for the participants, who in turn invite others to feel invited; and to anchor a memory for everyone, some part of the exhibition, intrinsically presupposes a collective space. The text, the traditional index of the art exhibition, is also an object of relationships and contact, enabling several exercises to be activated: that of meeting, collaborating, understanding, remembering, absorbing and digesting.

It's understandable that the members of Jackass wanted to avoid the taint of respectability: they stood at the confluence of the lazy-prolific ethos of skate culture, having unearthed an ambush comedy for the golden age of YouTube exhibitionism; and in the same movement, older and more honourable artistic traditions: silent cinema, Dadaism, Theatre of Cruelty, body art and other performative forms. Their formula was not one of consensus, rupture or criticism, but of expression wherever it could blossom, with no stakes and no pretensions, and each time offering the possibility of breaking free from conceptual constraints. 
       The meaning is never set in stone, the practice remains in motion. A movement that allows the project to enjoy great flexibility, a malleable density each time reinvented as soon as the protagonist changes. Its thickness grows with the diversity of the proposals. It's not an identity, it's a system. Modular, adjustable, perfectible, transitory, in motion, unstable, made-to-measure, fallow, assumed. Inventing and recognising ourselves is a way of expressing our movement, our actions and reflections, of expressing the responsibility that each of us accepts, in a virtuous loop that discovers its ends once the experience is complete. The exhibition is nothing more than a showcase. It's nothing more, nothing less, than the uncovering of an intuition, an ethic that becomes an aesthetic.  
        The exhibition is less a form of codified representation inherited from institutional spaces; it is a circumstance, a zone of meetings and assemblies of human beings and their interactions. What happens on these occasions is a series of inadvertencies, from the occupation of a stage where the speakers deploy a subject that is intended to be totally free —‘you do whatever you want’ being the sole guideline of the project— and whose use produces a considered understanding. The subject, the proposal, tends to have a lasting effect on those who share it (a memory!); and the event then takes on the value of a celebration: a unique and irreplaceable organisation, born of the responsibility of all those who organise the festivities. Creating an occasion to welcome them allows the wishes of those involved to be seen as serious and real, and to be honoured rather than legitimised. All these people come together in the affirmation of free expression, in an exercise that can reflect, express, sketch out, depict —if not confront— the real world, and that through this action it is possible to understand at least a small part of that world; that this occasion makes possible to produce an single image of it, which allows a world to slowly expand. And that beyond this intellectual striptease, a project is just that, and that once finished, we all return to the complex and unresolved blur of our mysterious condition.

        ASSS FOR SPASSS
Second Wednesday of the month
Chaussée d'Alsemberg, 110
1060 Saint-Gilles, Bruxelles



Relational Objects, Lygia Clark, 1976—1982
In the Name of the Place, Mel Chin & The GALA Comittee, 1995—1997

Bart runs for class president, The Simpsons

Funny Games, Michael Haneke, 1997

‘Four Stages of Simulation’ meme, in reference to Jean Baudrillard

Albums Panini

L2 and L1, Jean Guiraud

(unexpected)

Posy, Silicon Graphics, 2002

Naomi Campbell by Jean-Marie Perier, 1996

Maggie the Cat, Trajal Harrell, 2023
If the sun goes on torturing me, I will have to make a decision, I won't live here anymore, Guy de Cointet, 1983
Tell Me, Guy de Cointet, 1934—1983
Contaminations

Patty & Selma
Relational Objects, Lygia Clark, 1976—1982
Literature sausages, Dieter Roth, 1961—1970

Agnès Varda wearing a potato at the opening of her exhibition
Objects in the shade of the sun

boss
The location of the feather found can be indicated to the pigeon fancier who provided the contact details

Lady Eboshi
Camp Kill Yourself & Jackass
Dumb & Dumber, font
Natural pools

Smoke and drink at once, Joe Colombo, 1964
Threshold
Hello Kitty “thinking”

Portrait de la journaliste Sylvia von Harden, Otto Dix, 1926

Colors

Set  IFHY (I Fucking Hate You), Tyler The Creator, 2013

“Parental Advisory” label

Dialogue of constant questioning, Questions, Peter Fischli et David Weiss, 2000-2003

‘Book of the dead’, Necronomicon Ex-Mortis, Evil Dead II, 1981

Burn book, Mean Girls, 2004

‘My Story’ book in Bachelorette, Björk
Playing and collecting cards

Nest

Homage to the Square, Josef Albers, 1949—1976
Jovens se abraçando na praia de Ipanema, Ricardo Beliel, Rio de Janeiro ‘80 — via @fado_tropical

Soft belt




BIBLIOGRAPHY

        Starhawk, Quel monde voulons-nous?, 2019
        Starhawk, Comment s’organiser? Manuel pour l’action collective, 2021
        Bifo (Franco Berardi), Respirer—Chaos et poésie, 2024
        María Grace Salamanca Gonzaléz, Esthétiques du care pour l’Anthropocène, 2023
        Mark Fisher, Désirs Postcapitalistes, 2022
        Erving Goffman, Façons de parler, 1987
        ContraPoints
        Paul B Preciado, Dysphoria Mundi, 2022
        Auriane Preud’homme, Gossiping is Not (Just) Bitching, 2022
        Aristarkhova Irina, HOME-SITE: Homeliness of the House and its ‘Feminine Hospitality’, 2007
        Genesis Breyer P. Orridge, La poésie n’est pas une solution, Entretien avec Genesis Breyer P. Orridge, France Culture, 2012
        Anne-Marie Christin, L’image écrite ou la déraison graphique, 1995
        Thierry Chancogne, Histoire du graphisme avant la modernité en trois temps et cinq mouvements, 2018
        Yvonne Rainer, Work 1961—73, 2020
        Yvonne Rainer, Feelings are facts, 2006
        Fischli & Weiss, Fleurs & Questions, 2007
        Donna Haraway, Vivre avec le trouble, 2020
        Ruwen Ogien, L’influence de l’odeur des croissants chauds sur la bonté humaine, et autres questions de philosophie morale expérimentale, 2011
        Natahlie Sejan, Faire (et autres projets)
        Ann Patchett, “I am a compost heap, and everything I interact with, every experience I’ve had, get shoveled onto the heap where it eventually mulches down, is digested and excreted by worms, and rots. It’s from that rich, dark humus, the combination of what you encountered, what you know and what you’ve forgotten, that ideas start to grow”.
        Ryan Gander, LAX, 2021



May our joys last